Inquiry CartInquiry Cart
Home - blog

EIGRP or OSPF: Which Routing Protocol Best Suits Your Network Needs?

January 5, 2024

Understanding EIGRP Routing Protocol


The Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) is a Cisco-proprietary advanced distance-vector routing protocol. It is primarily used in large enterprise networks due to its scalability, flexibility, and robustness. EIGRP uses a unique algorithm known as the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) to ensure rapid convergence and prevent routing loops. In addition, it supports multiple network layer protocols such as IP, AppleTalk, and Novell IPX, making it versatile in various networking environments.


Key Features of EIGRP

EIGRP brings several distinctive features to the table. One of them is its support for Variable Length Subnet Masks (VLSM) and Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR), which optimizes the use of IP addresses within a network. Another notable feature is its ability to perform equal and unequal cost load balancing, spreading data traffic across multiple paths based on their respective metrics. Moreover, EIGRP implements partial updates instead of full periodic updates, reducing network traffic and enhancing efficiency.


EIGRP Router Configuration

Configuring an EIGRP router involves several steps. Initially, we enable the EIGRP process and specify an autonomous system (AS) number. Following that, we define the network addresses that the EIGRP process should advertise. Additionally, we can configure optional parameters like the maximum paths for load balancing, metric weights, and authentication. Lastly, we verify the EIGRP configuration using various show commands.


EIGRP vs Other Routing Protocols

Protocol Metric Algorithm Convergence Time Scalability
EIGRP Bandwidth, Delay, Reliability, Load DUAL Fast High
OSPF Cost (based on bandwidth) SPF Medium High
RIP Hop Count Bellman-Ford Slow Low

Advantages of EIGRP

EIGRP offers several advantages over other routing protocols. Its fast convergence time and support for unequal cost load balancing make it highly efficient. It also provides superior scalability, supporting large networks with numerous routers. Furthermore, its compatibility with multiple network layer protocols adds to its flexibility. Lastly, EIGRP’s use of partial updates significantly reduces network traffic, enhancing overall network performance.


What is OSPF?


The Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol is a link-state routing protocol used in Internet Protocol (IP) networks. Developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), OSPF is widely adopted due to its efficient handling of routing information and its excellent scalability. OSPF calculates the shortest path between nodes using Dijkstra’s algorithm, making it a highly reliable choice for complex network topologies.


Overview of OSPF Routing Protocol

OSPF operates within a single autonomous system (AS) and uses a hierarchical network design. It divides an AS into areas, with all areas connected to a backbone area. OSPF routers exchange link-state advertisements (LSAs) that contain information about other routers’ links, states, and costs. This information is compiled in a link-state database (LSDB), which is then used to compute the shortest path tree.


OSPF Network Configuration

Configuring OSPF involves several steps. First, the OSPF process is enabled on a router, followed by defining the network addresses to be advertised. The router ID is set, which uniquely identifies the router in the OSPF process. Areas are defined, and interfaces are assigned to these areas. Optional parameters like authentication and cost metrics can be configured. The configuration is verified using various show commands.


Comparison: EIGRP vs OSPF

Distance Vector Routing Protocol Distance Vector, Hybrid Routing Protocols Link-state routing protocols
AD=120 AD=100 Internal AD = 90
External AD = 170 AD=110
CIDR is not supported Supports CIDR, VLSM, and discontinuous networks CIDR is not supported Support CIDR, VLSM, and Discontinuous Networks Supports CIDR, VLSM, and Discontinuous Networks
Support for automatic summarization Does not support automatic summarization, can be manually summarized
hop Cumulative values of bandwidth and line delay for primary use link overhead
Maximum 15 hops Maximum 255 hops unrestricted
liberalization Cisco Proprietary liberalization
Only IP routing table in RAM RAM holds the neighbor table, topology table, and routing table. Hello creates a neighbor database (table) – LSA creates a link state database (topology table) (Routers with the same Area ID) – SPF calculates a routing table
Simultaneously supports IP, IPX, and APPLETALK three network protocols. Just support for IP network protocols
x Configure an Autonomous System (AS) number to distinguish routers that can share routing information. Configure a local process ID and use the area number to minimize updates to the same area, which must have Area 0 as the backbone area.
Using UDP Broadcast Routing Update Using UDP Multicast Use UDP to broadcast a slight update from the Use RTP protocol multicast, if no response, use unicast address retransmission 16 The network information is first transmitted to the DR via multicast, and then the DR uses multicast to update the routes to the neighbors.
Routing Table Updates Harmonized AS routing table update Only send routes with more changes Trigger to update routes with changes
Using the Bellman-Ford Algorithm Convergence using the Diffusion Algorithm (DUAL) Convergence using Dijkstra (SPF) algorithm
x Support for peer-to-peer authentication Text. x Supports peer-to-peer authentication MD5 Supports peer-to-peer authentication Text, MD5
X When configured, wildcards are used to pinpoint the network owner Tank The convergence algorithm itself makes OSPF truly loop-free.
If the Passive-Interface command is used on an interface, the interface only accepts route updates and does not send route updates, thus realizing horizontal segmentation and preventing route loops from occurring. If you use the Passive-Interfacet command on an interface, the interface neither accepts nor sends routing updates, realizing horizontal segmentation and preventing routing loops.
Instead of dynamic load balancing, the paths to the destination have the same number of hops, and the loads are evenly balanced across the lines. This can cause the pinhole effect Intelligently allocates packet traffic with more bandwidth, while load balancing using links with the same metric on multiple interfaces. Load balancing is weak, different priorities are assigned to paths to the destination, the highest priority transport packet is used, and load balancing is initiated only if it has the same priority.

Advantages of OSPF

OSPF offers several advantages. It has no hop count limit, making it suitable for large networks. Its hierarchical design allows for efficient routing updates, reducing network traffic. OSPF supports multiple equal-cost paths for load balancing, and its use of multicast addressing for routing updates enhances efficiency. It also supports Virtual Links, ensuring connectivity between non-backbone areas.


OSPF Routing Table

The OSPF routing table contains the best paths to all known networks. Each entry includes the destination network, next hop address, and cost metric. OSPF maintains separate routing tables for intra-area, inter-area, and external routes. The routing table is continuously updated to reflect changes in the network topology, ensuring accurate and up-to-date routing information.


Key Differences Between EIGRP and OSPF


In the realm of routing protocols, Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) and Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) are two prominent names. They both serve to determine the most efficient path for data packets through a network. However, they differ in several aspects, including their underlying algorithms, scalability, convergence times, implementation processes, load-balancing techniques, and security measures. This article delves into these key differences, offering a comprehensive comparison to help network administrators make informed decisions.

enterprise mpls eigrp rip interconnection
enterprise mpls eigrp rip interconnection

Routing Algorithms Used

EIGRP uses the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL), an advanced distance-vector algorithm that ensures rapid convergence and loop-free paths. On the other hand, OSPF is a link-state protocol that employs Dijkstra’s algorithm to compute the shortest path tree. While DUAL focuses on maintaining a balanced and optimized routing table, Dijkstra’s algorithm concentrates on calculating the least-cost path between nodes.


Scalability and Convergence

In terms of scalability, both EIGRP and OSPF are capable of supporting large networks. However, EIGRP generally exhibits faster convergence times due to its use of feasible successors. Conversely, OSPF’s convergence times can be slower, especially in larger networks, as it needs to recalculate the entire shortest path tree when network changes occur.


Implementation in Cisco Networks

EIGRP is a Cisco-proprietary protocol, meaning it is fully integrated and supported within Cisco devices. It provides seamless interoperability among different Cisco routers and switches. Conversely, OSPF is an open standard protocol developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). While it is supported on Cisco devices, it can also be implemented on non-Cisco devices, making it more versatile in a multi-vendor environment.


Load Balancing Techniques

EIGRP supports equal and unequal cost load balancing, providing flexibility in traffic distribution across multiple paths. This feature can optimize network resource utilization and enhance overall performance. In contrast, OSPF only supports equal cost load balancing, limiting its flexibility in some network scenarios.


Security and Authentication

Both EIGRP and OSPF offer security features, including authentication mechanisms to secure routing updates. EIGRP supports both plain text and MD5 authentication, while OSPF supports plain text, MD5, and SHA authentication. However, it’s important to note that these authentication methods do not encrypt data traffic—they merely authenticate the identity of routers exchanging routing information.

eigrp nat protocol comprehensive configuration experiment
eigrp nat protocol comprehensive configuration experiment

When to Choose EIGRP?


The Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) is a powerful routing protocol that is primarily used in large-scale enterprise networks. Its ability to quickly adapt to network changes, support for various network layer protocols, and scalability make it a strong contender for many network designs. However, the decision to choose EIGRP should be based on specific network requirements, topology, size, and the infrastructure in place.


Application in Specific Network Topologies

EIGRP excels in several network topologies. It’s particularly effective in hub-and-spoke topologies where one or more central routers (hubs) connect to multiple peripheral routers (spokes). EIGRP’s ability to perform unequal cost load balancing allows it to distribute traffic effectively across multiple paths in this topology. In meshed networks, where routers have multiple connections to other routers, EIGRP’s rapid convergence and loop prevention mechanisms ensure network stability and efficiency.


Advantages of EIGRP in Large Networks

In large networks, EIGRP offers several advantages. Its fast convergence time ensures minimal disruption during network changes, maintaining high availability. EIGRP’s use of partial updates reduces network traffic, which is crucial in large networks where frequent full updates can lead to congestion. Furthermore, its support for VLSM and CIDR allows for efficient IP addressing, which is often a challenge in large-scale environments.


Limitations in EIGRP Implementation

Despite its strengths, EIGRP has some limitations. As a Cisco-proprietary protocol, it lacks interoperability with non-Cisco devices, potentially restricting its implementation in multi-vendor environments. Additionally, while EIGRP supports various network layer protocols, its primary focus is on IP, which could limit its applicability in networks relying heavily on non-IP protocols.


EIGRP Deployment Best Practices

Proper deployment of EIGRP involves following best practices. These include limiting the number of routers in an EIGRP autonomous system to ensure manageable complexity and maintaining a consistent EIGRP configuration across all routers for stability. It’s also recommended to use passive interfaces where EIGRP isn’t needed and to implement route summarization to reduce the size of routing tables.


EIGRP Support for Proprietary Infrastructure

EIGRP’s status as a Cisco-proprietary protocol means it offers robust support for Cisco’s proprietary infrastructure. It integrates seamlessly with Cisco’s networking hardware, including its routers, switches, and firewalls. This integration ensures optimal performance, efficient resource utilization, and easy management within a Cisco-based network infrastructure.


When to Choose OSPF?


Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is a robust, link-state routing protocol that is widely used in many different types of network environments. It offers efficient routing, scalability, and support for complex network topologies. However, the decision to use OSPF should depend on various factors such as the network’s size, topology, vendor diversity, and specific use cases. This article will delve into these considerations, providing a comprehensive guide on when to choose OSPF.


Scenario-based Utility of OSPF

OSPF shows its strength in various scenarios due to its unique features. For instance, OSPF’s fast convergence times minimize downtime in networks with frequent topology changes. In hierarchical network designs, OSPF’s area concept allows for efficient management of routing information, reducing the overhead on routers. Additionally, OSPF’s cost-based metric facilitates effective traffic engineering in networks where bandwidth optimization is crucial.


OSPF in Multi-Vendor Environments

Being an open standard protocol developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), OSPF offers broad compatibility across devices from different vendors. This interoperability makes it an excellent choice for multi-vendor environments, providing flexibility in hardware selection and preventing vendor lock-in. OSPF’s widespread adoption also ensures a large knowledge base and community support, facilitating troubleshooting and optimization.


Optimal Use of OSPF in Small Networks

While OSPF is scalable and can support large networks, it also functions optimally in small networks. Its ability to calculate the shortest path using Dijkstra’s algorithm ensures efficient routing, even in small network topologies. Furthermore, OSPF’s support for VLSM and CIDR allows for flexible and efficient IP addressing, which benefits small networks with limited IP address spaces.


Drawbacks in OSPF Implementation

Despite its many advantages, OSPF has certain limitations. Its complexity can lead to higher CPU and memory usage on routers, especially in large networks with many routing entries. Additionally, OSPF’s cost metric, while useful for traffic engineering, can be challenging to configure correctly. Misconfiguration can lead to sub-optimal routing paths and reduced network performance.


OSPF Interconnection with BGP

OSPF can effectively interoperate with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), a protocol commonly used in Internet backbone networks. OSPF can be used for intra-domain routing within an Autonomous System (AS), while BGP handles inter-domain routing between ASes. This combination ensures efficient routing within and between large networks, making OSPF a strategic choice for organizations operating on the Internet scale.


Frequently Asked Questions


Q: What distinguishes EIGRP and OSPF?

A: EIGRP, a distance-vector routing protocol, forms routing tables with bandwidth, delay, load, and reliability metrics. Conversely, OSPF, a link-state routing protocol, uses a cost-based metric to identify the shortest path.

Q: Under what circumstances is EIGRP a better choice than OSPF?

A: EIGRP is typically chosen for smaller networks, mainly comprised of Cisco routers, due to its unequal-cost load balancing and fast convergence.

Q: When is OSPF a more fitting choice than EIGRP?

A: OSPF is generally chosen for larger, multi-vendor networks or those with numerous non-broadcast multi-access links because of its hierarchical structure and efficient resource utilization.

Q: What commonalities exist between EIGRP and OSPF?

A: EIGRP and OSPF are both dynamic routing protocols in IP networks, aimed at providing efficient paths for data transmission.

Q: How does EIGRP function in terms of protocol operation?

A: EIGRP shares routing information with neighboring routers via the diffusing update algorithm (DUAL) and ensures packet delivery with a reliable transport protocol.

Q: What are the main components of OSPF operation?

A: OSPF routers exchange link-state advertisements (LSAs) to maintain a database of the network topology, then use the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm to calculate the shortest path to each destination.

Q: How is routing information exchanged in EIGRP and OSPF?

A: EIGRP exchanges routing information with directly connected routers through a proprietary protocol, while OSPF disseminates routing info via link-state advertisements.

Q: What benefits does OSPF offer over EIGRP?

A: OSPF supports unequal-cost load balancing and multiple paths to the same destination, optimizing network resources. It also creates a hierarchy within large networks for efficient routing information exchange.

Q: What advantages does EIGRP have over OSPF?

A: EIGRP offers quicker convergence and loop-free routing, making it ideal for single-routing domain networks. It also facilitates efficient updates and minimizes bandwidth use for routing information distribution.

Q: Can EIGRP and OSPF coexist in the same network?

A: Despite being technically feasible, deploying EIGRP and OSPF in the same network is not standard due to the complexity and potential conflicts it introduces. It is advised to select and implement only one routing protocol throughout the network.



  1. Comparative study of EIGRP and OSPF protocols based on network convergence – This academic paper provides a thorough comparative study between EIGRP and OSPF protocols focusing on network convergence. It highlights that EIGRP performs better in a larger network than OSPF. Source
  2. Performance analysis of RIP, OSPF, IGRP, and EIGRP routing protocols in a network – An in-depth analysis of multiple routing protocols, including EIGRP and OSPF, discussing the number of updates needed, failure response, and overhead on each router. Source
  3. Dynamic routing protocol implementation decision between EIGRP, OSPF, and RIP based on technical background using OPNET modeler – This source discusses the technical requirements of different routing protocols, including the CPU power and RAM required by RIP compared to others. Source
  4. Evaluation of OSPF and EIGRP routing protocols for ipv6 – A focused evaluation of OSPF and EIGRP routing protocols specifically for IPv6. The paper discusses the need for running both versions of OSPF simultaneously. Source
  5. Performance analysis and route optimization: redistribution between EIGRP, OSPF & BGP routing protocols – This paper focuses on route optimization and redistribution among EIGRP, OSPF, and BGP protocols. It discusses the evolution of Cisco’s proprietary protocols. Source
  6. Router perspective simulation-based analysis of EIGRP and OSPF routing protocol for an organizational model – This source provides a simulation-based analysis from the router’s perspective on EIGRP and OSPF protocols for an organizational model. Source
  7. Simulation-based comparative study on EIGRP/IS–IS and OSPF/IS–IS – This source presents a comparative study on EIGRP/IS–IS and OSPF/IS–IS based on simulation results. It assesses the robustness of these protocols. Source
  8. EIGRP network design solutions – A book focusing on EIGRP network design solutions. It provides insights into route exchange issues with OSPF and how EIGRP was the first protocol to address them. Source
  9. On the Performance comparison of RIP, OSPF, IS-IS, and EIGRP routing protocols – This paper compares the performance of multiple routing protocols, including EIGRP and OSPF. It suggests setting up a network and using the protocols to decide which best suits the network’s needs. Source
  10. Performance analysis of OSPF and EIGRP routing protocols for greener internetworking – This source provides a performance analysis of OSPF and EIGRP for more sustainable internetworking. It suggests that EIGRP is more CPU efficient than OSPF for real-time applications. Source